NATO Comrades valued U.S. military

NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Contact us
Comrades valued U.S. military We ask that pensions MILITARY SUPPORT
Does not decrease RETROACTIVE pgbudau@yahoo.com

PENSION REDUCTION 714EURO - 599 EURO

We ask Comrades valued U.S. military support as not to undermine the military pensions RETROACTIVE

As retired military, with great respect, I ask from you, hoping that the problems that are to a relationship, will be subject to interpellations in parliament, addressed to those responsible for chaos in the military pension. As a Roman army officer, military graduate of the Faculty of Medicine MU activating the military physician, CAPTAIN OF THE MU LOCTIILOR VEGHIME 35ANI at Work, A WORK GROUPS IIA-specific conditions, positions of great responsibility on this line. As such, which is the subject of this letter is just following the study made by me (as an economist and chartered accountant) on line recalculation and review military pensions. I present below, in short, both steps of the theoretical and practical, of how chaos was installed earlier this recalculation activities / review, it became increasingly larger. Thus it was that the revised pension becoming cause for discrimination between military, since the amount was influenced as a result of development of normative acts of government, including minister of national defense orders, some of which are proven by the court as illegal, and the “chance “each of you be found by those who did recalculation / revision of all personal data that formed the basis of this process.

A. Legislative and His way of implementation:

1. In the military pension recalculation by the Minister of National Defence, we proceeded to the request by written request addressed to CMZ Hunedoara, the database of my monthly income, as well as, made by all military action. Mode of preparation of these certificates proving flagrant violation of art. 5 of O.G. 33/2002 regulating the release certificates and the certificates of public authorities and local, as well as of Article 125 of the Government 257/2011 for the approval of the application of Law 263/2010, which refers to the responsibility they have employers or any other holders of records on smooth legality, accuracy and correctness of data entered in the certificates they issue, in to establish, or review of the pension recalculation. State of affairs created during the months of January and February 2011, following the issue of illegal decisions recalculation is extremely known and therefore not refer to it. 2. Was issued and published in Official Gazette no. 81/31.01.2011, Emergency Ordinance No. 1, Article 3 which states: “to review the methodology for calculating pensions are used provided in Annex 3, as follows: • determine score by dividing the monthly salary monthly income gross / net of that month; • annual score is determined by dividing the sum of the 12 monthly scores made in that calendar year; • Annual average score is determined by dividing the number of points result from summing the scores achieved on the complete annual subscription. Complete contribution period referred to in Article 1, is 20 years. “ I pointed this Annex to prove that the contribution period as established unwanted effects due to general legislative framework in relation to different time periods in which retirees and military activity took place. 3. Since the military retirees are included in the category of military personnel both retired before 1995, the year No. 80 was approved law on the military, and after this year, it was natural that specialists committee that dealt with the method military pension calculation (steps described above) to be thought and art. 92 of this statute stating the age limits in the degree and the minimum in much lower level compared to the previous status, as well as nr.164/2001 Act, as amended and supplemented uilterioare, which, in accordance with 12, says that the retirement age fell from 60 years (extension written report up to 62 years) from 55 years to the rank of colonel, 53 years Lt. Col.., 47 years to Major, etc.. For this reason it was imperative that the contribution period of 20 years, to be differentiated for those who have been retired from 60 years upwards and for those who were forced by law to retire at the limit nr.80/1995 age in grade (55 years, 53 years, etc.).. But besides the above mentioned situation for our country’s entry into NATO, has been disbanded military units tens and hundreds, and most of the existing ones were restructured. For this reason the reserve was a lot of military personnel. Compensatory payments granted under the Ordinance nr.7/1998 were not “related to early retirement,” as erroneously says Minister of National Defence in the press conference on 09.06.2011. For example: two soldiers who began their military career at 20 years and retired, as required by law, 60 years and 55 years respectively, will receive different pensions: admitting that for each year the annual score is 1, show that average annual score is different and as such, and pension are different, as follows: 60 years - 20 years = 40 years work, thus resulting annual average score = 2 (40: 20), 55 years - 20 years = 35 years work, produces a yearly average score = 1.75 (35:20). Perhaps you will say that one has worked harder, and the other less, what is true, but is guilty soldier who worked less, since his retirement had not his fault, but because the legislation in force at that date? Conclusion: military pension retired before 1995 will be at least 12.5% higher than those of pensioners who retired under the law 164/2001. 4. Emergency Ordinance no. 1 / 2011, only three annexes, as follows: Appendix 1 on the amount and degree soldelor soldelor corresponding minimum function held military ranks, Annex no. 2 - Average annual salary and the minimum and annex the country. 3-on calculation methodology. I listed those Annexes and their content to demonstrate that, in accordance with Article 8, paragraph 1 of the review methodology for calculating pensions for beneficiaries coming from the defense system, public order and national security, “... gross income / net as appropriate, made monthly, used to calculate monthly score, include the salaries and the assimilated, received by beneficiaries under the laws in force at the time of their granting. “ These rights are listed in paragraphs a) to g). Or, surprisingly O.U. nr.1/2011 refers not only to point a), namely: “... salary tariff monthly / monthly pay / salary classification based on a monthly basis, including indexation, compensation, compensation management / command, wages, balance of merit and Similaire other rights provided by applicable law at that time “, while the income referred to in points b)-d) there is no mention. It would have been right and imperative as similar rights exist for these remarks on the determination and reconstituted according to the law, in case they can not be identified, since these rights are similar salaries as provided in the methodology of calculation. Is this omission accidental, considering that until 1990, were processed payroll once a month by the current CMZ-ins for all units within their radius of activity on those computers with punch cards? Thus, military units had their own computer system (in which case the majority were military units), more states have drawn mine, with changes in military evolution (advances, upgrading, providing rewards and annual awards , ETC.) occurred during the month. These additional states were filed with the provisions of expenditure, which after accounting law were in archive storage within 5 years, then under orders in force that destroys the archive. Behold, the percentage of 12.5% (increase for those retired before 1995 and decrease for those retired after this year) continues to be influenced positively or negatively depending on the identification or similar rights monthly salaries of luck to everyone and be carrying on activities in a computer system unit computer or not. This is why the reference periods in military activity coincides with the beginning and end of each month, as if all changes have occurred only on the first of the month and not during the month. Legislation on military pay very clearly states that payment of wages is made from the date of their production and not on the first of next month as these incomes are reflected in all databases that were used to recalculate / revision of pensions. Conclusion: Although the archive does not exist, it can be reconstructed by consulting agendas extracts the unit is kept as well as payroll and found prizes, rewards or data that occurred changes in the evolution of each military military and income as salary, but have not been consulted on grounds only factors of MoD N. known. Could also retrieve data from records of personnel, where such rights are registered. I am allowed to say the above conclusion, the fact that my personal approach undertaken by the UM.02405 Pitesti, rewards and prizes on the line identifying the period 1976-1990 annual, rather than respond to what I have asked , I have communicated the same data on monthly income that you already knew. 5. Megind further increase or decrease the percentage of revised pension subject to change and respecting Schedule. 1 to O.U.G. 1 / 2011 on how to use the data in Annex 1, meaning that the corresponding result of a military rank includes several classification function coefficients (eg from 3.10 to 3.50 Lt. Col.) and the actual calculation of pension review was used only the minimum coefficient (ie 3.10), disadvantaged military personnel who were employed on functions with coefficients greater than 3.10 (up to a maximum of 3.50 coefientul). In addition to this, the military allowed a framing function provided with a higher grade than it had at the time of appointment.

Annex 1 provides only the amount of OUG1/2011 soldelor soldelor grade and corresponding minimum function held military ranks. 6. During the recalculation / revision no attempt whatsoever to identify or reconstitute the original documents, proof of income made under the observance of GEO fully back 1 / 2011. Rather intentionally created a vicious circle from which you can get whatever you do not. My steps as well as other colleagues who were sent to the ministry of national defense, pension house sector of the Ministry of National Defense, CMZ to which each retiree, and reserves the archive military units that have remained unanswered or possibly a response to indigo.

B. METHOD OF COMMUNICATION OF RISK FACTORS FOR MND The course of military pensions review process

1. The chaos was caused not only by the application of normative acts of communication as well as we had on its website, coupled with delivery throughout the year to review decisions of course only increased by the entrance of the payment on various dates of 2011.

2. As for the communication on its website, data and information were repeated, thus: On 06/09/2011, accompanied by a press conference the minister, who to the delight of those who re-read, we noticed that it is full of elecorale praise and personal facts slowly turned most often to be false. For example, to demonstrate the regularity of data processed and made public, were observed several cases of generalized constant, namely: low pension until 09/06/2011, remained identical to 23/12/2011, including the decision to review, so No way to do something for the benefit of completing the database, pensions that have been posted on 06.09.2011, in amount of 3,000 lei were kept in the same amount as in December 2010, which leads to the idea that not have (re) calculated at all, or may have been deliberately kept at the same level to prove that the Prime Minister and fulfilled their promise, that the pension does not fall below 3,000 lei. The minister said in press conference on 09/06/2011 the review process is complete. We ask the question after this period that pensions were reviewed and were not sent completed review decisions? As a result of complaints made in particular by SCMD, on 29 June 2011, all those pension equal in amount to that in December 2010, posted on its website were arbitrarily increased with higher or lower amounts depending The amount of pension taken before the review process. Based on increases provided by the site were addressed to those cards from the Minister, all with equal or increased pension, which showed that it is all for electoral purposes. Sent review decisions were primarily for those whose pensions have increased, so that in December they received in pension payments and a larger percentage of difference for 2011, although GEO nr.1/2011 down in art. 7 1 “... the adjustment shall be made until 31 March 2012, by establishing payment amounts recovered or ...”, so additional amounts so paid in December as well as during 2011, probably as a mask for campaigning .

The chaos was beyond measure, when the vast majority of pensions under 3,000 lei mentioned on the site that find elevated in review decisions received in late December and early January 2012, have been reduced below the amount taken in December 2010, before starting recalculation process / review. These statements were made public and therefore not exemplify. C. Pursuant to the above, for which I take full responsibility for the assertion, back with the request that the Minister of National Defense to be questioned in parliament about this disorder (a real genocide on an important part of military pensioners) with following questions:

1. What are European countries where contributiveness principle applies to military personnel?

2. Respect the decisions of justice and if so, why not consider data solutions aest favorable effect by various courts and the Court of Appeal, that final and irrevocable?

3. Does the gentleman that was military, was paid for 8 hours as other civilian employees of 24 or 24 hours?

4. How to do the calculation algorithm experimentally on recalculation, military pensions review on the sample, with real or hypothetical, what conclusions were reached, what increases or decreases, or they could not be quantified. If you have been quantified, the quantification coincides with the end result obtained?

5. Why not finding databases to insist on compliance with national legislation and specific regulations? 6. Why in the communication made on different sites to blend in perfectly with the election campaign policies related to the revision of pensions? In this context, if it is honest to admit that is a reward that many reserve officers were registered among UNPR? Understanding that has something to do with keeping the subject of a increased amount of pension? 7. What is the purpose for which it issued Order no. MS132/28.12.2010 to amend Annex 1 to the “Detailed rules on the classification in special conditions and other specific conditions in military activity” approved by Minister of National Defence no. M.116/2002? Is it not a reason to discriminate between active military personnel and reservists? Is it chance that applied in 2011, the date coincides with the implementation of Law nr.263/2010? To eliminate this discrimination, it is considering extending the provisions of this order and the officers retired before that date?

MY CUNANTMULONTUMUL fell from EURO 704 --- 599 EURO
COMMON PRAY GOD son and St. Mary help us
Blessed be the USA and U.S. Army

                        I want to correspond with a military doctor Catholic
Lt. Col., DR. doctor
GEORGE P. BUDAU
                                        Piata Victoria 11/26
                                       DEVA 330 030 ROMANIA .--         HAS Been Message sent.

January 20, 2009, at 4:02 p.m.

   Prayer for Obama
Heavenly Father,
Welcome from the heart
Bless your servers
U.S. PRESIDENT OBAMA
And it fills his heart
The gift of your Spirit,
For proper that totdeana
It will run after you,
Give him long life
The health
Joy, happiness,
Abundance and peace
Amen!
                        Lt.Colonel doctor (reserve)
                            Dr.Gheorghe P. Budau.

                                         e-mail pgbudau@yahoo.com  09.01.2012